27.11.09
Alchemical Interweb
2:48 PM
The following are just a few of the many wondrous images contained on a site I recently completed for the artist Carl E. Brown, who has been very generous with me, and whose work I greatly admire...
http://www.cebrown.org
[All relevant information on Carl to be found online is included on this website, therefore I will also be using this post as my entry for him in my filmmaker "profiles"]
http://www.cebrown.org
Labels:
Carl E. Brown
|
0
comments
16.11.09
Lunch Break...
11:08 AM
http://musings.philsolomon.com/?p=204
Labels:
16mm,
Musings,
Phil Solomon,
Stan Brakhage
|
3
comments
14.11.09
Back to Winnipeg
1:30 PM
Trains of Winnipeg: 14 Film Poems (2004, Clive Holden)
The film portion of Clive Holden's poetic and penetrating multimedia project Trains of Winnipeg has been uploaded to The Auteurs website, where for a short time it will be available for free viewing. Personal, sociological, psychological and geographical concerns are explored through the connective tissue of a railroad excursion, meeting in the middle of both "analogue and digital ages", making for a highly varied viewing experience.
Trains of Winnipeg (the short) :: excerpt, printing press sequence from Images Video on Vimeo.
Holden has also made himself available for questions on the forum portion of the website...
(Also very much worth reading is this article by David Foster in Scope Magazine, which extensively explores the use of lyricism in the work)
Labels:
Clive Holden,
The Auteurs,
Trains of Winnipeg
|
0
comments
12.11.09
Playing the Pixels
3:21 PM
I was browsing through an older interview between Jonathan Rosenbaum and Jean-Luc Godard concerning his Histoire(s) du Cinema the other day when I came across a statement similar in nature to one made more recently in an interview with Andrew Noren, both concerning their use of video:
“Well, I’d say for technical reasons, because video is closer to painting or to music. You work with your hands like a musician with an instrument, and you play it.” - JLG
“if you think of cameras and editing systems as potential instruments for visual music, which I do, then this is empowering…For me, the entire digital apparatus is like a great visual piano of a wonderful sophistication.”-Noren
PURE SPECULATION on my part (and fairly superficial regardless) , but I wonder if Godard’s use of video, which dates back a ways, had any sort of influence on Noren (who stated in A Critical Cinema 2 that he still had an interest in Godard), in that they both, as stated in an article by David Phelps on Aberration of Starlight “understand that video’s faculties are not for showing the world anything as it concretely looks like.”
“Well, I’d say for technical reasons, because video is closer to painting or to music. You work with your hands like a musician with an instrument, and you play it.” - JLG
Éloge de l'amour (2001, Jean-Luc Godard)
“if you think of cameras and editing systems as potential instruments for visual music, which I do, then this is empowering…For me, the entire digital apparatus is like a great visual piano of a wonderful sophistication.”-Noren
Free to Go (Interlude) (2003, Andrew Noren)
Aberration of Starlight (2008, Andrew Noren)
PURE SPECULATION on my part (and fairly superficial regardless) , but I wonder if Godard’s use of video, which dates back a ways, had any sort of influence on Noren (who stated in A Critical Cinema 2 that he still had an interest in Godard), in that they both, as stated in an article by David Phelps on Aberration of Starlight “understand that video’s faculties are not for showing the world anything as it concretely looks like.”
Labels:
Aberration of Starlight,
Andrew Noren,
David Phelps,
Eloge de l'amour,
Free to Go (Interlude),
Histoire(s) du Cinema,
Jean-Luc Godard
|
0
comments
9.11.09
Sounds of Light
5:13 PM
---
River that must turn full after I stop dying
Song, my song, raise grief to music
Light as my loves' though, the few sick
So sick of wrangling: thus weeping,
Sounds of light, stay in her keeping
And my son's face - this much for honor.
Freed by their praises who make honor dearer
Whose losses show them rich and you no poorer
Take care, song, that what stars' imprint you mirror
Grazed their tears; draw speech from their nature or
Love in you - faced with your outer stars - purer
Gold than tongues make without feeling
Art new, hurt old: revealing
The slackened bow as the stinging
Animal dies, thread gold stringing
The fingerboard pressed in my honor.
Honor, song, sang the blest is delight knowing
We overcome ills by love. Hurt, song, nourish
Eyes, think most of whom you hurt. For the flowing
River' s poison where what rod blossoms. Flourish
By love's sweet lights and sing in them I flourish.
No, song, not any one power
May recall or forget, our
Love to see your love flows into
[page break]
Us. If Venus lights, your words spin, to
Live our desires lead us to honor.
Graced, your heart in nothing less than in death, go -
I, dust - raise the great hem of the extended
World that nothing can leave; having had breath go
Face my son, say: 'If your father offended
You with mute wisdom, my words have not ended
His second paradise where
His love was in her eyes where
They turn, quick for you two - sick
Or gone cannot make music
You set less than all. Honor
His voice in me, the river's turn that finds the
Grace in you, four notes first too full for talk, leaf
Lightning stem, stems bound to the branch that binds
the
Tree, and then as from the same root we talk, leaf
After leaf of your mind's music, page, walk leaf
Over leaf of his thought, sounding
His happiness: song sounding
The grace that comes from knowing
Things, her lover our own showing
Her love in all her honor.'
("A" by Louis Zukofsky, Joun Hopkins University Press)
---
23rd Psalm Branch Pt. 2 (1966/78, Stan Brakhage)
Labels:
23rd Psalm Branch,
A,
ARK,
Louis Zukofsy,
Ronald Johnson,
Stan Brakahge
|
0
comments
6.11.09
Jonas Mekas
4:43 PM
This will be the first in a series of informal "profiles" on film artists, gathering various articles and bits of information together that hopefully may act as some sort of resource for interested parties. Naturally I had thought about starting with Brakhage, but in truth there isn't much sense in doing so considering Camper's invaluable Brakhage page (I recently gathered updated addresses for all the dead or misdirected links on that page, if anyone is interested I can send them). In light of that I have decided to begin with the inimitable Jonas Mekas, whose influence and impact on the arts simply cannot be understated....
GENERAL INTRODUCTION:
WRITINGS BY/ON MEKAS:
MEKAS ON FILM/VIDEO:
INTERVIEWS WITH MEKAS:
FILM/DVD REVIEWS:
As I Was Moving Ahead... (The Village Voice)
As I Was Moving Ahead... (Variety)
As I Was Moving Ahead... (NY Times)
A Letter from Greenpoint (Reverse Shot)
A Letter from Greenpoint (Variety)
Lost, Lost, Lost (The Village Voice)
Lost, Lost, Lost (Strictly Film School)
Reminisces of a Journey to Lithuania (The Village Voice)
Reminisces of a Journey to Lithuania (Time Out NY)
Reminisces of a Journey to Lithuania (Strictly Film School)
Reminisces of a Journey to Lithuania (Slant Magazine)
Scenes From the Life of Andy Warhol (Only the Cinema)
Waden-Diaries, Notes and Sketches (The Village Voice)
Walden-Diaries, Notes and Sketches (Slant Magazine)
Walden-Diaries, Notes and Sketches (DVD) (Slant Magazine)
Walden-Diaries, Notes and Sketches (DVD) (Blogcritics)
”When I begin to work in the editing room, my method is elimination. I begin to eliminate until what's left is just what I want it to be. Then I begin to change the order, or trim something here and there. Some people have said that I'm careless, random, anything goes. The truth is that what stays in – every frame – is approved by me. The seeming randomness of my filmmaking is actually very deceiving. Because what I film is very precisely determined, chosen by my memory and intuition. And in the editing room it all goes through the Procrustean bed of my editing method. In short: I control absolutely every frame of my film.”
(If anyone has additional links, please let me know and I will be grateful to add them)
Labels:
Jonas Mekas
|
0
comments
5.11.09
Chemical Phenomena
10:30 AM
Boy’s Best Friend (2002, Cécile Fontaine)
Twilight Psalm II: The Walking Hour (1999, Phil Solomon)
Air Cries "Empty Water" Pt. 1: Misery Loves Company (1993, Carl E. Brown)
Cracked Share (2005/6, Lee Hangjun)
The Young Prince (2007, R. Bruce Elder)
No. 5 (1998, Olivier Fouchard)
Das Goldene Tor (1992, Jurgen Reble)
Aaeon (1968-70, Al Razutis)
Water Spell (2007, Sandy Ding)
Elephants’ Test (2005, Albert Alcoz)
Removed (1999, Naomi Uman)
Light Work Mood Disorder (2007, Jennifer Reeves)
Labels:
Al Razutis,
Albert Alcoz,
Carl E. Brown,
Cecile Fontaine,
Jennifer Reeves,
Jurgen Reble,
Lee Hangjun,
Naomi Uman,
Olivier Fouchard,
Phil Solomon,
R. Bruce Elder,
Sandy Ding
|
0
comments
4.11.09
When You Wish Upon A...
3:11 PM
In truth, list making can often be a fairly arbitrary undertaking, but there is no doubt that it is also an effective manner in which to occupy idle time, and can occasionally provide interesting insight into a person’s sensibilities, so under the guise of conforming to the rites of the rapidly approaching holiday season, I’ll elaborate on the five series (the concept of longer serial works, both cinematically and poetically, absolutely fascinate me) I most desperately wish I could have the chance (or the finances, yet again my main obstacle) to be able to see (I should probably note that I have seen parts of some of these series, but I want the whole thing!):
Consisting of A Child’s Garden and the Serious Sea (1991, photographed), The Mammals of Victoria (1994, photographed w/ hand-painted frames), The God of Day Had Gone Down Upon Him (2000, photographed) and Panels for the Walls of Heaven (2002, hand-painted), this was one of the last major works of Brakhage’s daunting oeuvre, one in which a lifelong mastery of the various tools of cinema were applied to create a solemn mediation on the various stages in the life of his second wife Marilyn (though according to Marilyn herself her relation to the films is slight) located on the landscape of the island of Vancouver and focused heavily on the sea. A primary source of inspiration for the series was Ronald Johnson’s ARK (in his essay Brakhage wrote that three poets in particular, among them Johnson, “contribute directly to my filmmaking as powerfully as Pound, Stein, Olson, Creeley and Dorn when I was young…”), perhaps my personal favorite of the 20th century long-poems, a work, that like most of Brakhage’s cinema, is full of wonder and visionary lyricism. In his book The Films of Stan Brakhage in the American Tradition, R. Bruce Elder, whose essay Brakhage: Poesis explores some of the relations between the two works, compares the films, in particular A Child’s Garden and the Serious Sea, to the works of Monet at Giverny in their transitory existence, a sentiment echoed by Fred Camper, who writes in an essay Brakhage’s Contradictions that each of them “ are among the hardest to fix in memory.” Having recently had the opportunity the fall under the spell of the ocean first hand, I eagerly await the opportunity to experience Brakhage’s hymns and return to the lapping waves anew.
(Of course there are many other Brakhage works that could be close-seconds on this list, The Art of Vision, The Song Series, Sincerity/Duplicity series, The Romans/Egyptians/Babylons, Passage Through: A Ritual, the Ellipses, and so on and so forth, you get the idea…)
Consisting of Huge Pupils (1968), False Pretenses (1974), The Phantom Enthusiast (1976), Charmed Particles (1979), The Lighted Field (1987), Imaginary Light (1994/5), Time Being (2001), Free to Go (Interlude) (2003), and Aberration of Starlight (2008). Having personally been involved in an ever increasing love-affair with the properties of light, in all its [meta]physical splendor, it is natural that I would be drawn to the work of Noren, who has been delicately illuminating the intricacies of such an infatuation for over four decades. During that time span Noren has investigated the perpetual daily dance of the particle and wave in color, black and white, and most recently digital, exploiting the subtle visual possibilities of each while traveling on what he terms “the fool’s progress”, collecting wisdom as the illusions of the world around him dissipate and reveal their truths. As usual augmenting my interest are the poets that Noren has drawn from and been connected to, in particular Louis Zukofsky, whose long-poem A and 80 Flowers are remarkable poetic achievements, whom both possess the ability to express the particulars of their immediate surroundings as ephemeral splendors. This being on my wish list involves more than just monetary barriers, the first three films in the series are currently entirely out of circulation, the first for apparently unknown reasons (some have speculated Noren’s hindsight apprehension over its frank nature, though in A Critical Cinema 2 Noren denied having any such concerns (it was heavily praised by many significant artists as an major achievement in the cinema of tactility), parts two and three supposedly for re-editing (again weaned from CC2).
Consisting of The Illuminated Texts (1982), Lamentations: A Monument to the Dead World Pt. 1 & 2 (1985), Consolations (Love is An Art of Time) Pt. 1-3 [Individually Titled](1988), and Exultations: In Light of the Great Giving Pt. 1-6 [Individually Titled](1990-1994), and clocking in at a staggering forty-two hours long, R. Bruce Elder’s aims at a mega-mediation on memory, time, history, and damn near everything in between, and though eventually abandoning it after accepting the impossibility of such a lofty feat, what exists surely seems to be one of the most ambitious creations of the cinema (let alone the avant-garde). As reflected in the length of his work, Elder is a great admirer of the “epic” or long-form poem, and modeled The Book of All the Dead specifically on Ezra Pound’s The Cantos (a work equally admired by Brakhage, identifying it in an essay on poetry and film as the single most important work in his life), and Dante’s Divine Comedy (of course involving Hell, Purgatory and Paradise, respectively), which naturally piques my interest, and gives insight into some of the thematic and structural techniques that are sure to be employed. Elder’s fortitude is seemingly inexhaustible, a few years later he embarked on a new cycle entitled The Book of Praise (currently consisting of four films), in addition to writing some of my favorite works of critical scholarship The Films of Stan Brakhage in the American Tradition…, and A Body of Vision, as well as Harmony and Dissent (I have not yet completed), which was awarded the Robert Motherwell Book Award. Also of interest is a manifesto/essay Elder wrote during the cycle concerning Canadian cinema entitled The Cinema We Need which, though I have been unable to track down, apparently took a deftly worded blowtorch to the critical film establishment of the country, and needless to say ruffled a few feathers.
Consisting of Moxon's Mechanick Exercises, or, The Doctrine of Handy-Works Applied to the Art of Printing (1999), The Enjoyment of Reading, Lost and Found (2001), Secret History of the Dividing Line (2002), The Great Art of Knowing (2004), Gatten’s biblio-cinematic blending of the spiritual and structural (if you ascribe to such divisions), inspired by a fortuitous encounter with a book written by William Byrd II (who happened to own the largest personal library in eighteenth-century colonial Virginia), gently investigates associations between text and image, past and present, depiction and actuality, and seemingly recapitulates in a relatively humble manner the various technical progressions of cinema. This is a largely handcrafted labor, Gatten employing a range of delicate processes to bring word to celluloid. Yet again I’m drawn to a source of poetic association/inspiration, this time Susan Howe, whose works explore many of the same themes on pages filled with elaborate and fascinating textual arrangements. I had the opportunity to briefly be exposed to his artistry earlier this year in the form of How to Conduct a Love Affair, a film that at the time left me puzzled, but has since carved its way into memory as a work of studious beauty. It is by all accounts a quietly ambitious undertaking, but one that would seem to have endless possibilities in Gatten’s reverent hands.
Consisting of over one hundred titles and an astonishing eighty hours, this reworking of Markopoulos’ entire filmic output, though still largely as yet unprinted (Markopoulos died in 1992), promises to be a wondrous monument of cinema, and indeed has been conceived to screen in a location fitting of such distinction. The Temenos, located in an isolated mountainous area of the Peloponnese, is a “visionary exhibition space”[1] where interested parties journey from near and far to experience the sensuous artistry of both Markopoulos and his long-time partner Robert Beavers in a wholly singular environment. I was afforded a glimpse into Markopoulos’ artistry in the form of Ming Green, an ephemeral evocation of the delicate light in a small apartment room, its remarkable simplicity only serving to augment its potency. Having also had the recent opportunity to witness Robert Beaver’s own cycle Winged Distance/Sightless Mesure, which surely must be one of the great works of cinema in its own right, experiencing Markopoulos’ cycle has the added allure of offering further insight into Beaver’s work (Sitney claims that “a parallel hyperbole might usefully claim that he constricted the history of cinema to the films of Gregory Markopoulos”). Like most of the work on this list, this one series stands as a literal opportunity to witness an entire life lived in conjunction with and expressed through the art form, an intriguing prospect for anyone dedicated to the medium.
[1]Eyes Upside Down [p. 124] P. Adams Sitney
2.11.09
Late in the Mourning
4:45 PM
It doesn't get much better than this....
ARK 34, Spire on the Death of L.Z.:
is this happening,
a quick as a squirrel's tail
spright of deer
but burnished as a
grackle
foci
evenly distributed as nesting sights
or silvery layers of film
over rotifers
trapeze
of paraphrase
in a sphere clumped
pool all a mareshiver
of light
executed in pure
katydid
half Mozart
fits and starts, half stars
both
holywork of oracular oak
thought through
dust's
simplest
scherzo scarecrow
tactics an acorn might
knuckle under
paradise
and pairs of eyes
past
all believing
[page break]
an edifice
of matched snailshell
faced to watch
Bach
in cherubim cliffed hayseed, rayed
cloud in plaster
forever
or near it
as consonance gets without
clef
to unraveled blizzard
huzzah cooperating with treble instances
such as orioles
between tulip trees
seizing the summerier dissonances
of worm
bees purring a
cappella
in utter emerald cornfield
till the cows come
purple home
this is paradise
this is
happening
on the surface of a bubble
time and again
fire sculpt of notwithstanding
dark
the whole parted word
in choir
[page break]
when the wind's bright horses
hooves break earth in thunder
that,
that is paradise
Lord Hades, whom we all will meet
crackling up
like a wall of prairie fire
in a somersault silver
to climb blank air
around us
to say then head wedded nail and hammer to the
work of vision
of the word
at hand
that is paradise
this is called spine of white cypress
roughly cylindrical
based
on the principle
of the intervals between cuckoos
and molecules, and molecules
reechoing:
these are the carpets of
protoplast, this
the hall of crystcycling waltz
down carbon atom
this, red clay
grassland
where the cloud steeds clatter out wide stars
this is
----
ARK by Ronald Johnson
Living Batch Press
Living Batch Press
Labels:
ARK,
Luis Zukofsky,
Ronald Johnson
|
0
comments
1.11.09
The Erotic Impulse
5:17 PM
Fuses (1965, Carolee Schneemann)
In an essay [1] on fellow Canadian artist Carl E. Brown, Bruce Elder examines parallels between such films as Man Ray’s L'étoile de mer, Stan Brakhage’s Dog Star Man Pt. 3 and Carl Brown's Air Cries “Empty Water” Trilogy (I would specifically point towards part two, The Red Thread)
that involve thematic explorations of the human “erotic impulse”, highlighting the material effects each filmmaker has applied to the surface of the film.
L'étoile de mer (1928, Man Ray)
In considering previous explanations of the union of “this complicity of desire with this sort of plasticity”, he believes that the majority of the so-called “modernist answers” have come to an incorrect and simplified conclusion that the relation shared by image and the surface events (re:effects) are negative, in that the images are rendered inscrutable and are subsequently less alluring.
Dog Star Man Pt. 3 (1964, Stan Brakhage)
He posits that the true answer is much more complex than that. The effects imposed on the surface of the film seem to be essentially without form, thereby negating concept and resisting quantitative significance, or in other words they could be characterized as nothing, which itself is a negative notion. Contrary to that is the fact that while it is true that the image can often be obscured by the events taking place on the surface, they can just as often amplify the significance or structure of the image, which would certainly be categorized as a positive relation.
Air Cries "Empty Water" Pt. 2: The Red Thread (1993, Carl E. Brown)
He goes on to further illuminate the complexity that underlies this relation, examining the positive, the resistance of the surface events, like flesh (quite literally the “skin of the film”), to be separated into individually significant parts, as well the libidinous nature of the reaction we can have to these events, and the negative, the inconsistency amongst the surface events can also be more than reality or pleasure can contain, and thus manifest themselves in the same way uncontainable desire does, with decay and eventually death.
Halcion (2007, Dietmar Brehm)
Furthermore he invokes Freud and illustrates conflicting themes such as Eros (the personification of lust/love) and Thanatos (the personification of Death), Symbolic and Imaginary, the unmoving image (stasis) and the fluctuating surface, and the potentially ecstatic tension created by their coexistence within these films.
Eros and Wonder (2003, R. Bruce Elder)
He closes with the following: “Like a moebius strip, then, the image turns into the surface event that turns back into image, as eros is transformed into thanatos and thanatos into eros. These transformations cannot be conceptualized and stated discursively, for meaning depends upon signs and signs depend upon distinctions and separations and what we have here is fusion in form of coincidentia oppositorum (the coincidence or unity of opposites).”
Christmas On Earth (1963, Barbara Rubin)
A fascinating subject I think, one that has, and if mined further can continue to, yield considerable insight into a certain mode of film that many richly creative and expressive film artists have produced.
Le Tombeau d'Aphrodite v.2 (2004, Olivier Fouchard)
[1]This essay, which in its full form is much more eloquent and enlightening than my humble and extremely simplified summary can attest to, originally appeared in Northern Exposures: Recent Canadian Experimental Film. Buffalo: CEPA Gallery, 29 Jan.-30 Apr. 1994: 3-7.[touring program Albright-Knox Gallery and George Eastman House Museum]. R. Bruce Elder was awarded the Robert Motherwell Book Award this year for his book Harmony and Dissent: Film and Avant-garde Art Movements in the Early Twentieth Century, a much deserved honor.
Transferimento di Modulazione (1969, Piero Bargellini)
(The images I’ve included were not a part of the original essay)
Labels:
Barbara Rubin,
Carl E. Brown,
Carolee Schneeman,
Dietmar Brehm,
Man Ray,
Olivier Fouchard,
Piero Bargellini,
R. Bruce Elder,
Stan Brakhage
|
1 comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)